I hope my position was a bit clearer this time, and that I haven’t put you off from contributing. We have many precedents on similar Thank you for the contribution. So, should we revert this We should, yes.
#GITX ROWANJ UPGRADE#
Soon, when upgrade functionality and appcasts are up-and-running, these will bring advantages that will make versioned downloads better, and then it makes sense to switch. :no_checksum and latest must be used together, or the audit fails.Ĭurrently, here’s where we (somewhat unofficially) stand: latest is at the moment superior to versioned, so it is preferred. It seems to be legal even when the version is not :latest Versions will be more useful when we have upgrade functionality. Like appcasts, they’ll be useful later, and were implemented with the idea of thinking ahead. It's not clear to me why one would ever bother with the checksum if it's preferably absent! Using latest as the preferred option was the standard at the time, so until a consensus is reached, it makes sense to not change that. The idea of it is exactly to find the best option. As I said, it is an open issue, and it is an open discussion. It also gives pro/con bullet points as to why the reverse might be preferable. That said, in the interest of clarity, I’ll just point out the answers to your concerns briefly and directly.Īnd the issue gives some pro/con bullet points as to why If that was the case, my apologies, as it was not the intention. Reading your reply, I understand my comment might have sounded a bit rough. Is an arcane, special purpose feature is not at all clear just look at the Work-like normalizing internal data structures or proofreadingĭocumentation-that most projects welcome folks pitching in with. Versioning and checksums looks like the sort of hard-but-desirable grunt :latest, so should someone do a mass edit to remove the checksums?) Preferably absent! (It seems to be legal even when the version is not It's not clear to me why one would ever bother with the checksum if it's To CONTRIBUTING.md along with some language in the version and sha256 Something like the sentence you wrote above could just be added I did a lot of reading in order to come to the wrong conclusion,Īpparently.
#GITX ROWANJ DOWNLOAD#
Instead, "use versions only if no unversioned download is available", it The issue gives some pro/con bullet points as to why. md seems to suggest preferring versions where possible, and The solution anyway was the same that antid0te implemented and worked immediately.Read together with CONTRIBUTING.md, the issue seems to say the opposite.ĬONTRIBUTING. I verified with few colleagues and apparently it doesn't happen to everyone who upgraded to Sierra, but I'm still investigating the roots of this change. The problem is related (I believe) on how the localhost name resolution works and how the class is retrieving the addresses.
On the post I also link to a github project to help troubleshooting the issue and validating the solution. If you're interested you can find some details on the issue and solution here:
#GITX ROWANJ MAC#
Macbook.local, or whatever your Mac is called) on the /etc/hosts file mapped to the 127.0.0.1 address as well as the ::1 like this: 127.0.0.1 localhost mbpro.local I solved the problem by adding my Mac hostname (i.e. disabling csrutils didn't solve the issue for me.
Tomcat went from 15 seconds to 6 minutes to initialise spring context after the upgrade.
0 kommentar(er)
